It is interesting to stand out, in this phase, handsbboks of social Psychology de Murchison (1935), Lindzey (1954) and Lindzey & Aronson (1968-1969; 1985). In these manuscripts, Lindsey affirms to breach with the metaphysics of European social psychology and to create a scientific social psychology, with positivistas bases. Here it is interesting to stand out what Bernardes flame of theoretical conceptions that if they had unfolded or that had been crossed in social psychology: they are the forms elencadas for Farr (1996): psychological and sociological. In the first one, the explanations of the collective one and the social one are reduced the individual laws. The individual is the center of the analysis, its relations with the social context does not influence. It has a separation between the man and the social one.
What it matters, in this in case that, is the behavior of the individual (behaviourism); in the sociological form, the scholars value the relation between individual and the collective one. It is accurately this psychological social psychology that if develops in the North America, as he is salient for Bernardes: ‘ ‘ Its basic principles in explanations of the social phenomena are: to treat them as natural phenomena through experimental methods, being that its clarifying molds always send in them, in last instance, the explanations centered in indivduo.’ ‘ (2010, P. 27) Referenciais theoretical as of George Mead, who places ‘ ‘ study of the language and the human thought inside of a context evolucionista’ ‘ (BERNARDES, 2010.P. 29) and its model of mind: ‘ ‘ its model of mind was synthesis of phenomena in such a way in collective level how much in level individual’ ‘ (Id.ib.), they had been ignored in the constitution of social psychology American north. Another left perspective of side was the critical description, centered in the marxist ideas of ideology, alienation and conscience of classroom, with transformation objectives.
No comments yet.