The educator cannot open hand of being an annunciator of the hope, of the new, what he will demand of itself indifference disruption with established standards. What also he can be verified in the reply of Citizen 30: … the professor must persist, have the courage of being bold and not to also have fear of being a little wild in the question of the education. The insane person is that one that invents the new things. The changes will also give in the environment and external conviviality and in its ' ' eu' '. This will generate curiosity, questionings, teorizaes, appreciations the favor or against the changes in the proper teaching identity. She is necessary to emphasize that the construction of a new identity for the professor must occur concomitantly to the construction of one another relation with the pupils, mainly perceiving them as allies and not as problems, as people and not as simply pupils. So that he has this change in the way to see the pupils have that to also change the nature of the educative situations, becoming producing professors and pupils to know.
He urges to change relations of being able, what he assumes one practical pedagogical one that exclusively are not established in the opposition between who know and who ignores, but that it can contemplate the reversibility of the educative papers. When thinking about the two flowing classic of the school, pupils and the professors, and its relationship in the direction of the construction of the knowledge, is that we can come back our referring looks toward our expectations and yearnings to ' ' school of futuro' ' as it will be the education in the society contemporary. That place will inside occupy the education of the public politics and the interests of the people? Relatively to the future of the education in them they cannot remain any doubts of that it will keep all its importance (Subject 23).
No comments yet.